<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye, Canon.  Hello, Nikon.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/</link>
	<description>Liverpool Photographer who&#039;s passionate about photographing people and places.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David J Colbran</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Colbran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrelish.net/?p=393#comment-738</guid>
		<description>I upgraded to a couple of D700&#039;s at the start of the year and got to say I&#039;m really happy with the performance and durability. As you say the ISO at high levels absolutely rocks - I&#039;ve used them in all sorts of low-light situations, from churches to clubs to nights at music festivals - and they even get through the Alamy checkers !

Also they take a bit of a battering, but the bodies seem quite sturdy and no sign of wear and tear after 6 months of heavy use. Wasn&#039;t the same with my D200&#039;s.

Anyway, know a few people who have switched from Canon to Nikon this year.

All the best, David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded to a couple of D700&#8217;s at the start of the year and got to say I&#8217;m really happy with the performance and durability. As you say the ISO at high levels absolutely rocks &#8211; I&#8217;ve used them in all sorts of low-light situations, from churches to clubs to nights at music festivals &#8211; and they even get through the Alamy checkers !</p>
<p>Also they take a bit of a battering, but the bodies seem quite sturdy and no sign of wear and tear after 6 months of heavy use. Wasn&#8217;t the same with my D200&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Anyway, know a few people who have switched from Canon to Nikon this year.</p>
<p>All the best, David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t'ski</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>t'ski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrelish.net/?p=393#comment-735</guid>
		<description>keep us informed on how it goes will, I have always been a canon guy but always interested in the alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep us informed on how it goes will, I have always been a canon guy but always interested in the alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrelish.net/?p=393#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Hey, Doug!

I can&#039;t help but think if you&#039;d gone with Nikon you&#039;d now be wondering whether you should have gone Canon ;O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Doug!</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but think if you&#8217;d gone with Nikon you&#8217;d now be wondering whether you should have gone Canon ;O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrelish.net/?p=393#comment-732</guid>
		<description>I went freelance recently after many years as a press snapper using Canon and Nikon. Could&#039;nt decide which kit to buy with £12k to spend. Went for Canon but maybe I&#039;m thinking it should have been Nikon.
Cheers

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went freelance recently after many years as a press snapper using Canon and Nikon. Could&#8217;nt decide which kit to buy with £12k to spend. Went for Canon but maybe I&#8217;m thinking it should have been Nikon.<br />
Cheers</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrelish.net/?p=393#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Susan!

And might i say that&#039;s some nice monetised virtual real estate you have there.  A quantity of unique content, a decent spread of one-way inbound links from sites, nice spread of syndicated articles and no overly obvious cookie-cutter footprints although I did find a few.

Why not add a few (cloaked) affiliate links for the products and services you review?  If not to the individual providers then perhaps Amazon links?  I know Amazon rates aren&#039;t great, but then some of the software is hundreds of dollars and the tracking cookies stick around for a while.  Beats relying on AdSense!

I&#039;ve developed an affiliate link cloaking and tracking system which let&#039;s you create much more memorable and legible URLs.  Let me know if you&#039;d like to know more about it.

By the way, I&#039;m flattered you consider a nofollow backlink from my site to have some value ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Susan!</p>
<p>And might i say that&#8217;s some nice monetised virtual real estate you have there.  A quantity of unique content, a decent spread of one-way inbound links from sites, nice spread of syndicated articles and no overly obvious cookie-cutter footprints although I did find a few.</p>
<p>Why not add a few (cloaked) affiliate links for the products and services you review?  If not to the individual providers then perhaps Amazon links?  I know Amazon rates aren&#8217;t great, but then some of the software is hundreds of dollars and the tracking cookies stick around for a while.  Beats relying on AdSense!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve developed an affiliate link cloaking and tracking system which let&#8217;s you create much more memorable and legible URLs.  Let me know if you&#8217;d like to know more about it.</p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;m flattered you consider a nofollow backlink from my site to have some value <img src='http://www.digitalrelish.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Schlenger</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrelish.net/393/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Schlenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrelish.net/?p=393#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your detailed thoughts on Nikon over Canon. It&#039;s always difficult to weed through all of the information.
Good job!

Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your detailed thoughts on Nikon over Canon. It&#8217;s always difficult to weed through all of the information.<br />
Good job!</p>
<p>Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
