EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS

Back when I was first thinking about buying my 40D, I thought about the first lens I wanted to go with it. I considered the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM, but decided against it due to the relatively high cost. Then, after a couple of months with the EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM I settled upon, I decided I wanted, no, needed the 17-55mm!

The pull of the f/2.8 was just too strong and so last week I took delivery of the lens (and am now looking to re-home my 17-85mm) and it was just how I expected it to be; the fast aperture and IS resulted in an excellent low light performance and the autofocus is blazingly fast.

A couple of aspects which I’d read about, but weren’t expecting were:

  • Slightly stiff zoom ring. The zooming action just doesn’t have the silky, dampened action of an L lens such as my 70-200mm f/4. Perhaps the stiffness will ease up over time. We’ll see.
  • Clunking at each zoom extreme When you hit either 17mm or 55mm, you really do hit it. The clunking is even there when turning the zoom ring slowly.
  • Dust behind the front element. I’d read about a potential dust problem, but didn’t think I’d be seeing it after less than a week. I don’t know how it’s getting into the lens, but I’ve managed to shake off a piece of dust that was sitting on the glass behind the front element. It’s not affecting image quality, though. I even attached a UV filter as soon as I removed the lens from its packaging so I don’t think the dust is making its way through there. See what people are doing to remove the dust [1, 2, 3].

These points aside, I’m going to give the lens a chance to make me overlook the points above and convince me that they don’t impact on what I’m expecting to be a superb lens.  After all, I don’t think a bit of dust inside the lens is going to be an issue at when something like this is taken into consideration.

Oh, and no, I don’t think it quite deserves to bear the L designation. At least not with the above, albeit minor, faults.

Follow-up

After a few months of using this lens, I have to say that I love it.  The dust issue that some people seem to complain about is a non-issue to me as image quality isn’t compromised at all.  The lens’ performance is outstanding; it’s incredibly sharp even wide open, focuses fast and works well in low light thanks to the fast f/2.8 aperture and IS.  For cropped Canon bodies, I think this is the best walkabout lens you could possibly get.  It’s not a cheap lens, but what you get is L-like performance on an EF-S mount.

This entry was posted in Blog, Canon, Equipment and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] my EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 with its faster aperture and Image Stablization really helped make the low-light environment [...]

  2. [...] f/2.8 IS USM zoom lens despite reports about problems with dust. After my initial encounter with dust inside the lens, I’m glad to say that I’ve not had any more such issues and that the lens has performed [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>