Search
-
Recent Posts
Categories
Category Archives: Showcasing
Liverpool Halloween Lantern Carnival 2011 at Sefton Park
The Liverpool Lantern Company and co. once again put on an excellent Halloween lantern carnival at Sefton Park. It’s reported that this completely free event attracted approximately 20,000 people. When you think how much organisation must go into to planning such a massive event in pitch black darkness it’s difficult not to be impressed. There were people of all ages in attendance including families with young children. Everyone I saw seemed to be having a great time. I can’t wait for next year’s event!
Also posted in Blog
Tagged 2011, carnival, costumes, Halloween, lanterns, Liverpool, Liverpool Lantern Company, performers, Sefton Park
2 Comments
Black and White Event
Recently, I shot a corporate black-tie event which had some dynamic range busting lighting with the raging early evening summer sunshine beaming into parts of a very dimly-lit venue. Aside from the challenge of capturing the event for the client, I was able to have a little fun with the light…
‘Consecration’ Gallery Online
I’ve just finished uploading the photographs which form Consecration; my documentary project based upon the events of a two-day ceremony to commemorate the completion of a new ancestral hall in my family’s village in Hong Kong. You can view the gallery over at http://www.digitalrelish.net/galleries/consecration/.
A subset of these photographs were recently exhibited as part of the Look2011 International Photography Festival hosted in Liverpool.
Copyrights and Wrongs
Watermarks and people who help themselves to my images. I’ve never been a fan of either, but the former is required (in my opinion) to help fight against the latter.
I use watermarks on images I post online in order to:
- Deter people from using my images without my permission.
- Ensure viewers know who the images belong to, should they be used despite the watermarks.
I also only make lower resolution images publicly available to help prevent them being usable for anything other than online viewing.
As with any visible method of protection, there are downsides to some watermarks:
- They can be cropped out of an image.
- They can be cloned out of an image.
- They detract from the viewing experience intended by the photographer.
The last point is why I’ve tried to use subtle watermarks because I personally find most to be too distracting and end up competing with the actual image itself for the viewer’s attention.
Recently, a speaker at a not-for-profit conference took it upon themselves to download a number of my images (which were all flagged as all rights reserved) from Flickr and incorporate them into their presentation without asking me beforehand. I only found out through another source and took exception.
Had the speaker contacted me before their presentation and sought permission or if they’d used them via Flickr then there wouldn’t have been a problem. One of the reasons why I took the photographs was to share them with others and Flickr is my chosen vehicle to do this. I don’t rule out other mediums, but I want to have the option of deciding which. They are my images, after all. What right does anybody else have in saying how they’re used?
From my perspective, they took my images, used them without my permission and expected I’d never find out. They were wrong, in every way, and apologised profusely when I contacted them, but still gave no explanation as to why they didn’t seek my permission first. It’s plain and simple theft.
What the speaker didn’t appreciate was the consequence of being caught out. Sure, they get to carry on as they please and hopefully their conscience will prevent them from stealing other people’s work in the future, but what happened affected me and caused me to reconsider how I share my work. It had to.
So, maybe I watermark more heavily and reduce the resolution of the images I publish. Will this prevent any more instances of theft? I hope so. Will it detract from the viewing experience? I can’t see how it can’t, but what choice do I have?
Liverpool Sunset Time Lapse Revisited
For several weeks, I’ve been unable to return to Anglican Cathedral tower for the Thursday evening viewings in order to keep fine tuning my technique due to the poor weather we’ve been experiencing. Thursday, just gone, was the last scheduled night viewing from the roof of the tower. So, I decided I would pay a visit come rain or shine. The addition of the Liverpool ONE Wheel on the skyline gave me even more reason to go. To my good fortune, the weather was almost ideal; plenty of clear, blue sky, interesting cloud formations and most importantly it was dry!
Here’s the time lapse video clip from this latest trip.
Interestingly, I just noticed one of my earlier time lapse videos made top spot of Flickr’s Explore for October 17th 2009. It may not stay there indefinitely, but I found it an interesting occurrence nonetheless.
Just as with SEO and religion, I’m not really one for discussing possible theories about how Flickr measures interestingness. I have my own theories about such things and don’t feel the need to convince anyone else unless they’re paying me for it. I will say this about Explore: I think it is more a measure of marketing rather than photography/videography. Perhaps, you can understand why I think this is? Agree/Disagree?
Also posted in Blog
Tagged Anglican Cathedral Tower, D700, Explore, Flickr, Interestingness, Liverpool, Nikon, sunset, time lapse, video
1 Comment





























